The Changing Role and Status of women in Britain since 1900 – source related study

1. lineage A is useful as it shows how united the Suffra chartertes were in 1908. It avows in the caption beneath the photograph, that at that place was said to down been 200000 people who attended. They olfactory sensation standardized they atomic number 18 determined to procure what they want. Some of the wo custody are holding banners, flowers and flags. on that point is a police human cosmoss in the nook of the picture. This shows that the police thought that the kick great major power become violent. The Suffragettes were known for heckling at meetings, deliberately trying to get ar fill-ined and get direct to prison, and in 1908 they began to attack properties. The Suffragettes cerebrated that inactive campaigns were getting them nowhere. In 1908, wo work force had already achieved umpteen im come out manpowerts in their education, legal flops and job opportunities. unless they still wanted to earn the flop to be open to vote in General Elections. This may be what the protest was for. The Suffragettes had a lot of support, give outicularly in capital of the United Kingdom. in that location were thirty-four branches of the WSPU in London al ane and fifty-four branches in the rest of the coarse. Source A shows that the Suffragettes are like a big team and family. They al unity look determined to get what they want. The WSPUs precept was Deeds not Words, this meant that they believed that actions were difficulter than words.Emmeline Pankhurst is leading the protest. In the Suffragettes first public demonstration in 1905 Emmeline said, Then amid uproar and shouting, the women were seized and flung out of the hall. In proof this source shows that the Suffragettes were a strong group of women who had strong opinions and views. This source shows that the Suffragette achievement was a strong force to be reckoned with thus affecting peoples locations. There would be those people in full support, with some(a) women openly and legion (predicate) offering resistless support. Mens attitudes would be very dissimilar. Up until now the womens place was in the home. The polices attitude was one of recognition of their consider commensurate power and they feared the implications of this, thus the police presence in Source A suggests the need for containment and stripe of violence.2. Source D and E are both extremely useful in showing us what peoples views about the Suffragettes were in 1910. Source D is taken from a British crudespaper, and is obviously written by a man. It is reliable to show the nigh peoples opinions of what the Suffragettes were doing at the time. Source E is withal useful as it is a postcard that was issued by the Suffragettes. It shows the suffragettes opinion. The postcard would be use to persuade people to become one of them. It shows what women could be a mayor or a nurse, and cant vote thus far men could be lunatics or drunkards and they can vote. This is sloped as it has been induce d by the suffragettes, and is very one sided. However Source D is overly sloped as it doesnt show the views of the suffragettes, alone the writers view about what went on.In Source D the writer uses phrases such as shameful recklessness and desperate women to show how the country should be ashamed of the way the suffragettes stomach acted. This newspaper article does not erstwhile say why the suffragettes were doing what they were doing. Im certainly many people agreed with what was written stock-still I am as well sure a lot of people were a producest what was written. In the headline it says DISGRACEFUL SCENES Reckless Women transmit Headlong into Cordon of Police. The word disgraceful suggests that the country should be ashamed of the actions of the Suffragettes. Men expected women to be quiet and obedient so when women started to lift against this stereotype, the campaign for womens votes was important news, especially with the papers. The Suffragettes began to create posters, which got them some sympathy from people in the public.In Source E it says What a woman may be and notwithstanding not ask the Vote. Underneath, it has pictures of women being a mayor, a nurse, a doctor, teacher and a factory hand. It also says what a man may fork over been and yet not lose the vote. Underneath, it has pictures of men being a convict, a lunatic, an owner of white slaves, being unfit for service and a drunkard. Of course, women could also be all of the things the males are, and the males are able to have all of the livings the females have however in this postcard the women have completely been shown as being good things, whereas the men have been shown as being bad. This would have got the suffragettes some more support.In conclusion I believe that both sources are equally reliable. They both are biased and they both show different opinions of different people at the time.3. When the First human beings War began so many men had gone away to fight, tha t women were compulsory to do their jobs. This meant that the number of women working in exertion increased massively. The war made it delicious for women to work in shipyards, collieries and brickyards. Some of them worked as highly skilled engineers and carpenters. In some of these jobs, women were welcomed, however in others they were resented because they had little or no training for jobs, which had previously postulate very skilled people.If thither was an option during the war intimately soldiers wouldnt be able to vote. Women soon realised that this could be their prospect to pressurize the government to let them vote. There were no demonstrations, however there were many meetings between womens leaders and politicians and telegrams and letters were sent to MPs. In 1918 Parliament passed a new nearness, which allowed women over the age of 30 to be able to vote.From my knowledge of what happened, I believe that the war was a big part of Parliament passing a law allo wing women to vote. As there may not of been enough males in the country at the time of the war, to vote if there was an election, they needed females. I also think that because most men were away during the war, the women proved themselves to be useful, as they started doing work in factories and so on. Men had never seen females do this sooner so it may have been a shock to them to see that women could do things serious as good as them. In Source J, Herbert Asquith says, I will influence it impossible to withhold from women the power and the right of making their voices heard. This proves that women proved themselves by working while the men were away at war. They even convinced an ex indigenous minister that they were worthy of having a say about what goes on in there life.The war didnt help the French Suffragette women gain the vote.In conclusion I do agree with the statement Without the First introduction War British women would not have gained the right to vote in 1918. I also believe that women would not have received as much reckon from men as they do today if the war hadnt of happened. Women had a chance to prove to people that they were able to do things just as well as men in this period of time.